[Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202334





------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com  2007-08-27 17:17 EST -------
(In reply to comment #23)
> Tom:  I can't figure out what you mean by the licenses.

I just meant that whatever code is licensed under those two BCLA license files
must be removed from the tarball.  It's hard to know exactly which jars are
problematic because there could be some re-namespacing going on.  I wondered
about classes in the org.mortbay namespace, for example.  But I didn't do
in-depth forensics.

Here are two specific examples of jars that need to be removed from the zip:

./ext/activation.jar
./ext/mail.jar

activation.jar:
http://java.sun.com/products/javabeans/jaf/downloads/index.html

Look at META-INF/MANIFEST.MF:

...
Implementation-Vendor: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Specification-Vendor: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
...

mail.jar:
http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/downloads/index.html

Likewise, META-INF/MANIFEST.MF:

...
Implementation-Vendor: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Specification-Vendor: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
...

There may be more.  It may be safest to just remove all jars to create a
modified source zip.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.