[Bug 409011] Review Request: pam_fprint - Integrate libfprint with existing applications

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Dec 4 12:03:52 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pam_fprint - Integrate libfprint with existing applications


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409011





------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2007-12-04 07:03 EST -------
packaging looks ok to me
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream url
bfb041ed856aaac5c5c416973451226  pam_fprint-0.2.tar.bz2
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ Compiler flags used correctly.
+ defattr usage is correct.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Package pam_fprint-0.2-2.fc9 ->
  Provides: pam_fprint.so
  Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libfprint.so.0 libpam.so.0
libpam.so.0(LIBPAM_1.0)
+ Not a GUI App.

waiting for libfprint build

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list