[Bug 421921] Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Dec 12 20:47:45 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421921
nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEEDINFO |NEW
Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at la|
|poste.net) |
------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-12-12 15:47 EST -------
- VERIFY - Legal should verify text of the cgats/License.txt & icc/License.txt
BSD-like files
Those bits are not linked against anything else, and not exported by Argyll
since it's all statically linked. So the only compatibility problem we may have
would be between the GPLv3 and Argyll, and since their common author judges it's
ok, exposing those licenses to users seems rather useless to me.
But for legal to judge.
The bits I'm actually worried against are the GPLv2 files in spectro linked
against all this GPLv3 codebase, since they are *not* written by the same
author. It's rather unclear to me if they're GPLv2+ and Graeme W. Gill is
pedantic in exposing their license, or not.
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
- FAIL - Should be 'GPLv3+ and BSD-like' instead of merely 'GPLv3+'
If you want but BSD-like is not a valid license
- FAIL - %doc should include the cgats/License.txt and icc/License.txt files too
OK
- PASS - recommend changing to use an explicit %dir
My preference usually too, must have been exposed to too many line counters to
not have done it this way from the beginning
- PASS For the icclink clash I recommend changing 'argyllcms-icclink' to
instead be 'icclink-argyll' so it tab-completes under shell
Good idea
- FAIL Needs 2 aforementioned buffer overflow patches
More patches like that welcome :p
- the %changelog section contains a number of unusual UTF-8 characters
SPECS are UTF-8, and changelog in particular can contain UTF-8 names (which is
the case there), so asciifying presents no interest
Thanks a lot for this timely review! New files at the same place as previously
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list