[Bug 307891] Review Request: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Dec 18 17:05:08 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-12-18 12:05 EST -------
(In reply to comment #20)
> libtool is in BuildRequires because the build process uses it to build the
> libraries.
- Really? Your spec file actually does not call libtoolize
and currently I cannot find where actually libtool is needed.
> This package provides a C++ library and a C library (libvpd_cxx and libvpd
> respectively). On my system, rpmbuild does not fill out the Provides section so
> when I would install something that depended on either of these I would get
> unsatisfied dependency errors.
rpmbuild automatically adds
"Provides: libvpd_cxx-1.4.so.1", which should correctly remove
the need of writing "Provides: libvpd_cxx", for example.
If unsatisfied dependency error occurs, then I guess the dependency
is _actually_ not satisfied (you cannot ignore soversion mismatch,
for example).
> I have not been able to get rpmlint to work on my debian or
> gentoo systems yet.
... Please import Fedora system :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list