[Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Dec 21 14:58:12 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761





------- Additional Comments From bradbell at seanet.com  2007-12-21 09:58 EST -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> * Source tarball
>   - Well, I tried to download the source from the written SourceURL,
>     however only I could find CppAD-2.0.1.tgz?
>     (source tarball check is needed for license check)

The cppad package is maintained using COIN-OR which prefers the CPL license
      http://www.opensource.org/licenses/cpl1.0.php

Because some of CppAD users prefer GPL, both available for download from
      http://www.coin-or.org/CppAD/Doc/download.htm

The distribution files on this web page correspond to the trunk of the svn
repository and the version number changes each day; i.e., the corresponding
files are today called
      http://www.coin-or.org/CppAD/Doc/cppad-20071221.cpl.tgz
      http://www.coin-or.org/CppAD/Doc/cppad-20071221.gpl.tgz

The tarball CppAD-2.0.1.tgz is different in that is a direct copy of the
subversion repository corresponding to version 20071016 of CppAD. If one
executes the following commands
      tar -xzf CppAD-2.0.1
      cd CppAD-2.0.1
      ./build all
It will create the file
      cppad-20071016.gpl.tgz (GPL license, Unix file format)
and also create
      cppad-20071016.cpl.tgz (CPL license, Unix file format)
      cppad-20071016.cpl.zip (CPL license, Dos file format)
      cppad-20071016.gpl.zip (GPL license, Dos file format)
This process builds the documentation and hence one needs a copy of OMhelp to do
this. OMhelp is distributed with the GPL license at
      http://www.seanet.com/~bradbell/omhelp/installunix.htm
All of the *.tgz and *.zip files contain the necessary OMhelp source to rebuild
the documentation.

1. Which license would Fedora prefer to use ?

2. Does this make CppAD depend on the OMhelp package because it is used to build
the documentation from the source code files ?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list