[Bug 251950] Review Request: moodbar - Identifies the "mood" of your music files

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Dec 30 05:50:17 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: moodbar - Identifies the "mood" of your music files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251950





------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com  2007-12-30 00:50 EST -------
>> xx - follows Package Naming Guidelines
>>    + although the Debian package is named 'moodbar', PLD-Linux, OpenSUSE and
>> FreeBSD call it 'gstreamer-plugins-moodbar'; in fact the README says Moodbar is
>> the algorithm and the package contains a GStreamer plugin and an application --
>> what do you think?
 
> Our guideline is "follow the tarball's name", so I'd rather go with "moodbar".

Umm... We have gstreamer-plugins-farsight, farsight and farsight-devel in
Fedora. However they are distributed as separate plugins. Would it make sense to
split this into moodbar and gstreamer-plugins-moodbar, or you consider it as an
overkill?

>>    + remove the versioned BuildRequires since both F-7 and F-8 have
>> gstreamer-devel >= 0.10
 
> I'd rather keep it, in case someone wants to rebuild it on an older
> distribution, or in a spinoff of Fedora which would have and older gstreamer.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines?highlight=%28Packaging%29#Requires
says: "As a rule of thumb, if the version is not required, don't add it just for
fun." But that might be a suggestion and not a requirement. I will leave this to
your judgement.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list