[Bug 225751] Merge Review: file-roller
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Feb 3 18:07:52 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: file-roller
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225751
bdpepple at ameritech.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|bdpepple at ameritech.net |caillon at redhat.com
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review-
------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-02-03 13:07 EST -------
Good:
* Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines
* Group Tag is from the official list
* Buildroot has all required elements
* All paths begin with macros
* All necessary BuildRequires listed.
* Package builds in Mock.
Must Fix:
* Source URL in not canonical
* Remove unnecessary Requires:
Requires(post): desktop-file-utils
Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils
Refer to:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?action=show&redirect=ScriptletSnippets#head-de6770dd9867fcd085a73a4700f6bcd0d10294ef
Minor:
* Duplicate BuildRequires: glib2-devel (by pango-devel), pango-devel (by
gtk2-devel), gtk2-devel (by libgnomeui-devel), libgnomeprint22-devel (by
libgnomeprintui22-devel), autoconf (by libtool)
* Could use -disable-static and not bother building static libs.
* It looks like the Requires on GConf is unnecessary.
* Is the conflicts on nautilus still necessary?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list