[Bug 226295] Merge Review: php-pear

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Feb 6 09:21:25 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: php-pear
Alias: php-pear

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226295





------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com  2007-02-06 04:21 EST -------
- the source code files distributed in PEAR carry a copyright notice with the v3
license.  Those copyright notices alone define how the source code is licensed,
and the License tag on the package should reflect that and only that.

- the .phar archive is the only way found to bootstrap PEAR

- it is desirable to have PEAR build from a separate source RPM; it has an
independent upstream (and hence release cycle) to PHP, and we can ship updates
to this small self-contained part without revving the entire PHP package (which
is large, fragile, and needs lots of QA for every update).  There is
insufficient motivation here to change that.

- whatever package gets reviewed is subject to change as new upstream releases
come out.  1.4.11 or 1.5.0 or 1.6.0.  1.4.11 is what's in Fedora at the moment
and what's up for review.

- the License tag, presence or lack of %build, $RPM_SOURCE_DIR vs %{SOURCEn} -
changing these is a bikeshed painting exercise unless and until specified by a
Fedora packaging guideline.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list