[Bug 226445] Merge Review: symlinks

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Feb 6 16:57:41 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: symlinks


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226445





------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de  2007-02-06 11:57 EST -------
A very interesting case ;)

1. rpmlint:
W: symlinks summary-ended-with-dot A utility which maintains a system's symbolic
links.
Stylishness - Should be fixed.

W: symlinks invalid-license distributable
More on this below.

W: symlinks no-url-tag
Doesn't make much sense, but to satisfy the burecrats, I'd propose to use
URL: ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/utils/file/

2. License
Could not find an explict license, but a terse "freely distributably" inside of
the *.lsm. tsx-11 origin => Very old, widely used and known to be distributable
package - IMO "distributable" is the correct term for this.

3. *.spec:
Would you explain the getconf-call in:
make CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS $(getconf LFS_CFLAGS)"

getconf causes the package to use the flags it receives from system the package
is being built on
=> 
- Potential (I am inclined to think almost zero) risk of non-deterministic build
results when users rebuild the package
- Not much of an issue when building the package inside of a build system as
part of a distro, except that it might tie this package to the specific
environment it is being built on - I am not sure what to do about it. Hardcoding?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list