fedora-review granted: [Bug 227811] Review Request: hunspell-af - Afrikaans hunspell dictionary

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Bug 227811: Review Request: hunspell-af - Afrikaans hunspell dictionary
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Component: Package Review

manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> has granted manuel wolfshant
<wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro>'s request for fedora-review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227811

------- Additional Comments from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro>
Caolan: I am willing to work with you through all dictionaries.

Quick review for this package:
- unzip is not needed as BR because it's on the exception list (see 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/FullExceptionList)
- adding -q to the %setup line and an empty %build would silence rpmlint (see
below)

Everything else seems fine
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines 
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream , sha1sum fa0dfbe45efd7eeba04e069f2e5987b721ebae71 
af_ZA-pack.zip
- the package builds in mock, devel/x86_64, generates a noarch (which is
consistent with the fact that basically it includes only 3 text files)
- the license LGPL stated in the tag is the same as the web site says
- there are only 2 files (word lists) + a short doc with instructions and
license clearance, so no .la, .pc, static files
- no missing BR
- MINOR: unneeded BR: unzip
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all files/directories that it creates, does not take ownership of other
files/dirs
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- rpmlint output:
on source:
W: hunspell-af setup-not-quiet
W: hunspell-af no-%build-section
on binary: silent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs as the only doc is just a 31K text file
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file 

The package is APPROVED but before comitting to CVS please fix the three small
problems mentioned in the first paragraph.