[Bug 220630] Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging.

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Feb 14 04:59:52 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220630


rc040203 at freenet.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de  2007-02-13 23:59 EST -------
OK, the issues I mentioned above don't seem to have actual side-effects:

* Diffing the log of a mock-built against a user-built:
...
-checking for java... no
+checking for java... java
 checking for javac... no
...
 checking whether compiler accepts -Werror... no
=> Looks like a bug in the configure script to me.
 
...
-checking dynamic linker characteristics... cat: ld.so.conf.d/*.conf: No such
file or directory
-GNU/Linux ld.so
+checking dynamic linker characteristics... GNU/Linux ld.so
=> Probably a buggy configure.


* Also I don't understand why libqpidbroker.so.0 exists at all.
It's exclusively used by qpidd, there is no devel package associated to it, but
... let me presume upstream has reasons for doing so.


None of them are show-stoppers.


Remains one issue:
* Source0: Should be an absolute URL.

Provided you add this, consider this package APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list