[Bug 169704] Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169704


jpmahowald at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com  2007-02-16 03:24 EST -------
FYI the mosml site seems to have a contributed rpm.

Does not build on x86_64. Add to the x86_64 exclude tracker.

2.01-9 again, this time builds on F7 devel i386:

rpmlint of mosml-devel-2.01-9.fc7.i386.rpm:W: mosml-devel invalid-license
GPL/ATT/INRIA/Distributable
W: mosml-devel no-documentation

rpmlint of mosml-pg-2.01-9.fc7.i386.rpm:W: mosml-pg invalid-license
GPL/ATT/INRIA/Distributable
E: mosml-pg invalid-soname /usr/lib/mosml/lib/libmpq.so libmpq.so
W: mosml-pg no-documentation

rpmlint of mosml-gd-2.01-9.fc7.i386.rpm:W: mosml-gd invalid-license
GPL/ATT/INRIA/Distributable
E: mosml-gd invalid-soname /usr/lib/mosml/lib/libmgd.so libmgd.so
W: mosml-gd no-documentation

rpmlint of mosml-2.01-9.fc7.i386.rpm:W: mosml invalid-license
GPL/ATT/INRIA/Distributable
E: mosml invalid-soname /usr/lib/mosml/lib/libmregex.so libmregex.so
E: mosml invalid-soname /usr/lib/mosml/lib/libmunix.so libmunix.so
E: mosml invalid-soname /usr/lib/mosml/lib/libmgmp.so libmgmp.so

rpmlint of mosml-gdbm-2.01-9.fc7.i386.rpm:W: mosml-gdbm invalid-license
GPL/ATT/INRIA/Distributable
E: mosml-gdbm invalid-soname /usr/lib/mosml/lib/libmgdbm.so libmgdbm.so
W: mosml-gdbm no-documentation

rpmlint of mosml-docs-2.01-9.fc7.i386.rpm:W: mosml-docs invalid-license
GPL/ATT/INRIA/Distributable

rpmlint of mosml-examples-2.01-9.fc7.i386.rpm:W: mosml-examples invalid-license
GPL/ATT/INRIA/Distributable


no-documentation ignore, docs subpackage

Good:
+ Proper BuildRoot
+ Macros throughout
+ subpackages require base package
+ commented
+ defattr for all packages
+ ownership good
+ header files split out
+ Downloaded source matches

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.