[Bug 226795] Review Request: sdcc - Small Device C Compiler

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: sdcc - Small Device C Compiler


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226795


j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl




------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl  2007-02-24 06:14 EST -------
Hi all,

Some remarks:
-I agree that having a seperate -devel package for the header files is bogus
-But I think that a -src subpackages containing the libc sources would be a good
 idea, as normally these aren't needed for sdcc to function, or am I missing
 something here?

As also said on the mailinglist I like the current spec, in general it looks
good. So I would like to review this and thus actually get it into extras.

However since the special nature of this and all the talk about other
corss-compilers, I would like to suggest having 2 reviewers. What I have in mind
is that I do a formal review and that Ralf looks over my shoulder, then when I
approve this package, Ralf reviews it too (which should be a no-op) when Ralf
then approves it too he sets fedora-review to + and the CVS procedure can be
started. Does this sound like a plan?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.