[Bug 230324] Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Feb 28 16:53:28 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: avrdude -Software for programming Atmel AVR Microcontroller


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230324





------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de  2007-02-28 11:53 EST -------
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > (In reply to comment #10)
> > > (In reply to comment #9)

> > > Because its unnecessary deviating from upstream, upstreams docs / FAQ's
> > > mailinglist advice will say look at / edit /etc/avrdude.conf and it won't be
> > there.
> > Now you've lost me. Upstream lack of insight/experience as argument ?!?
> > 
> 
> No staying close to upstream as argument al by itself,
We are supposed to be system integrators. It's our job to integrate/customize a
package in such a way it fits best (what ever this means) into a system. This
exactly is the reason why configure scripts exist and why configure scripts
supply a --sysconfdir option. It's our job to choose what we think is best.

My experience tells me /etc/<file> is a mistake, because many other packages
commited the same mistake before and regretted it.

> just like we want to use
> the upstream <prefix>/<target> dir for gcc cross compilers amongst other
> things to not deviate from upstream.

Nope, not deviating from upstream is not the point wrt. <prefix>/target

The real reasons are 
* prefix/target is an established defacto standard for > decade, predating the
FHS/LSB.
* like many other "exotic" items and details it is missing from the FHS/LSB.
* prefix/target is not a configuration item. It's hard-coded and almost
impossible to change.

I'd be more than pleased to see this changed, but ... it's simply non-trivial
and non-realistic.

> Now if upstream but the config file under /usr/etc
> I would the first to say @#$% upstream and move that file to a better place, but
> there is _nothing_ wrong with upstream's placing in this case, so why move it
> and confuse users?
Cf. above. It's our job.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list