[Bug 220683] Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jan 5 19:54:55 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220683





------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2007-01-05 14:54 EST -------
In reply to comment #4: 

>To thet best of my knowledge, teh guidelines only require that the license is
>included in the rpm if it is distributed by upstream in the tarball - the lack
>of a license file should therefore not block this review. 

Correct... my concern isn't that the license text isn't included, it's that
there is nothing at all in the package referring to what the license _is_.
Everything says 'see LICENSE.txt'.

Not to say that it would happen, but they could ship a LICENSE.txt in the next
release that was not acceptable for extras, and say 'Thats what we always meant". 

>There's been nothing but crickets so far on my request to add the license to
>the tarball, so it might be a little bit before upstream fixes it.

Anoying. :( 
I'll try and think of how we can address this... 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list