[Bug 221924] Review Request: xwnc - Mix of Xvnc and XDarwin with improved protocol

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: xwnc - Mix of Xvnc and XDarwin with improved protocol
Alias: xwnc

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221924


wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro  2007-01-09 04:11 EST -------
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines, including a comment specifying the fact
that parallel make is broken
- license ( GPL v2) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source is the last available version and matches upstream, 
f6df982eaebd4bf7f26661c126a1747a9cb0ecb1 xwnc-0.3.3.tar.gz
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- MINOR: duplicate BR autoconf (by automake), automake (by libtool)
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories/files that it creates, does not own foreign files/dirs
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- is an X server, so no need for .desktop file
- no .la, no scriptlets, nothing related to devel (static, header files)
- rpmlint is silent on both src.rpm and generated binary rpm
- does not segfault on start :)


I suggest the following
- modify 
%{_bindir}/*
into
%{_bindir}/Xwnc
so that you have better control and do not pull in unneeded stuff in case
upstream changes something
- add NEWS to %doc, it seems to contain more useful info then the included README
- fix BR if you feel like it (according to packaging rules, duplicate BR are
acceptable)


APPROVED


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.