[Bug 245342] Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jul 4 19:00:38 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245342





------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2007-07-04 15:00 EST -------
Not to step on Nigel's toes, but here are some comments:

W: perl-Gnome2 devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/Install/gnome2perl-versions.h
W: perl-Gnome2 devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/Install/gnome2perl.h
W: perl-Gnome2 devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/Install/gnome2perl-autogen.h
These are expected rpmlint complaints for many arch-specific Perl modules.

Something is wrong with the debuginfo package; it misses most of the source.
There are many errors like:
  cpio: Gnome2-1.041/BonoboDock.c: No such file or directory
  cpio: Gnome2-1.041/BonoboDock.xs: No such file or directory
  cpio: Gnome2-1.041/BonoboDockItem.c: No such file or directory
in the build log.  This is more a bug in find-debuginfo.sh than it is in your
package, but generally we try to fix such things when we find them.  (This kind
of thing happens often with Java packages for some reason.)  The problem is that
it's not looking in the xs directory.

You can alleviate this by the incredibly nasty act of putting "cp xs/* ." at the
end of your %build section.

Otherwise, this package is clean and I would probably approve it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list