[Bug 247467] Review Request: isabella-coq - An AGI adventure game

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: isabella-coq - An AGI adventure game


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247467


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |tibbs at math.uh.edu
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2007-07-11 00:35 EST -------
These are getting pretty routine now.  The only question I have is where the 0.1
version comes from; I couldn't find any mention of a version upstream.

I installed this and perhaps I'm dense but I couldn't figure out how to select
the language at the beginning.  It seems to me that the mouse is supposed to
work but for me, at least, it doesn't.  Is there something special I need to do
in order to enable mouse support in nagi?

* source files manually compared with upstream.
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is acceptable for content.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   isabella-coq = 0.1-1.fc8
  =
   /bin/bash
   /bin/sh
   hicolor-icon-theme
   nagi
* %check is not present; no upstream test suite.
? Manual testing was not terribly successful.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* acceptable content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.