[Bug 246748] Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC)
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jul 11 20:32:48 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246748
------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-07-11 16:32 EST -------
rpmlint output:
[mclasen at localhost Desktop]$ rpmlint
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result/ohm-0.1.1-0.fc8.i386.rpm
W: ohm service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ohmd
[mclasen at localhost Desktop]$ rpmlint
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result/ohm-devel-0.1.1-0.fc8.i386.rpm
W: ohm-devel no-documentation
both are ignorable, imo
package name: ok
spec file name: ok
packaging guidelines: ok
license: ok
license file: ok
license file included: ok
spec file language: ok
spec file readability: excellent
upstream sources: ok
buildable: ok
BRs: ok
locale handling: ok
ldconfig: ok
relocatable: n/a
directory ownership: BAD, -devel must require pkgconfig for /usr/lib/pkgconfig
file list dupes: ok
defattr: ok
%clean: ok
macro use: ok
permissible content: ok
doc package: n/a
%doc: ok
headers: ok
static libs: n/a
.pc files: BAD, see above
shared libs: ok
-devel requires base: ok
la files: ok
desktop file: n/a
directory ownership: ok
%install: BAD, must do rm -rf %{buildroot} at the beginning of %install
utf8 filenames: ok
Two mustfix items, and one whishlist item, then you are good to go:
- Must require pkgconfig in -devel
- Must clean buildroot in %install
- Should include AUTHORS and README in %doc
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list