[Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Jul 28 05:50:08 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417





------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com  2007-07-28 01:50 EST -------
I have figured out the problem.

This program does not use a Autoconf/Automake generated Makefile. In the
top-most Makefile it sets BOUML_LIB = /usr/lib/bouml and thus irrespective of
the host machine it puts everything in /usr/lib and not /usr/lib64, where that
is applicable. Hence using %{_lib} and %{_libdir} leads to the failure.

One more thing which concerns me are the following lines in src/Makefile :
CFLAGS   = -pipe -Wall -W -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
-fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386
-mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables  -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_SHARED
-DQT_TABLET_SUPPORT -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT
CXXFLAGS = -pipe -Wall -W -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
-fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386
-mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables  -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_SHARED
-DQT_TABLET_SUPPORT -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT

Will the use of -march=i386 in the C and C++ compiler flags also lead to problems?

For your reference I had tried a build by prepending the following line to the
SPEC file:
%define _lib lib
...and it successfully built. See
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=80288

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list