[Bug 240807] Review Request: asl - Macro Assembler AS

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Jun 3 15:33:02 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: asl - Macro Assembler AS


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240807





------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com  2007-06-03 11:33 EST -------
:-)

>> My first question was why you wanted the "something" part to be build55 rather
>> than bld55.  The upstream designation is bld55, not build55.

it's just a packaging naming question for fedora packages names.
i.e: a pacakge named bar-1.2-b5.tar.gz will be named for fedora inclusion like
that -> bar-1.2-0.1.beta5.%{dist}.%{arch}.rpm
Same thing for bld which'll become build.



>> My second question was why you wanted the n in 0.n to be 1.  I started with 1
>> (0.1bld55), and the SRPM I submitted for review was my eighth build release,
>> so the n had been incremented to 8, thus 0.8bld55.

If so, your Changelog section is not correct.
Each build/fix you've done from your spec/pakcage files SHOULD be mentioned in
the changelog section.
As it's your eighth build release, your seven first SHOULD precede this last one
in spec file.
When you update or fix some features in your package you have to increment your
release to n+1 and add lines (not replace the old) in changelog about this new
build.





-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list