[Bug 239526] Review Request: python-gammu - Python bindings for Gammu

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jun 5 01:10:58 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-gammu - Python bindings for Gammu


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239526


panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2007-06-04 21:10 EST -------
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
- rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM
+ rpmlint is silent for RPM.
+ source files match upstream url
a2470a7336286805d9698b3d67bb23c1  python-gammu-0.20.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no static libraries.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Provides: Core.so
+ Requires: gammu libGammu.so.1 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libm.so.6 libpthread.so.0
libpython2.5.so.1.0 python(abi) = 2.5 rtld(GNU_HASH)
APPROVED


Don't forget to solve rpmlint warning on SRPM.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list