[Bug 242544] Review Request: xbiso - an ISO extraction utility for xdvdfs images
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jun 5 15:13:36 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xbiso - an ISO extraction utility for xdvdfs images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242544
dan at danny.cz changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-06-05 11:13 EST -------
OK source files match upstream:
5d7a051e2dc3d7ff07ac75ce6e6625e7aaaed4ca439401275ce54e96dc531c92
xbiso-0.6.1.tar.gz
OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
OK dist tag is present.
OK build root is correct.
OK license field matches the actual license.
OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package.
OK latest version is being packaged.
OK BuildRequires are proper.
OK compiler flags are appropriate.
OK %clean is present.
OK package builds in mock (i386) and FC-6 (x86_64).
OK debuginfo package looks complete.
OK rpmlint is silent.
OK final provides and requires look sane
OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
OK doesn't owns any new directories
OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
OK no duplicates in %files.
OK file permissions are appropriate.
OK no scriptlets present.
OK code, not content.
OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
OK docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
OK no headers.
OK no pkgconfig files.
OK no libtool .la droppings.
OK not a GUI app.
Everything is good, so the package is APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list