[Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556





------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2007-06-08 13:07 EST -------
>I thought I had addressed this issue with the --disable-rpath
>configure flag. I don't think there's anything funny in my makefiles
>that should re-introduce it.

Yeah, me too. Will investigate more... 

>It makes sense to link these statically. I will make it so in the next
>ecryptfs-utils release.

Well, not sure they need to be static... I think the idea was to move the
libraries from /usr/ to /lib|/lib64. That would allow them to work fine for
people who have /usr on a remote fs or the like. 

>It sounds like the key modules shipping with the ecryptfs-utils
>package would best be statically linked too.

Again, not sure static is needed, simply move them to a /lib/ecryptfs/ instead
of /usr/lib/

Notting: Any input on static vs simply moving to /lib ?

Thanks for looking at this Mike!

>Re: kernel requires vs. conflicts; conflicts is what we've historically done in
>packages such as initscripts, hal, and so on that don't work with older >kernels.

ok, can leave the Conflicts for now. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.