[Bug 243573] Review Request: python-memcached - A Python memcached client library.

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-memcached - A Python memcached client library.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243573


ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com  2007-06-10 08:37 EST -------
Source RPM:
W: python-memcached summary-ended-with-dot A Python memcached client library.
W: python-memcached invalid-license Python

* RPM name is OK
* Source python-memcached-1.36.tar.gz is the same as upstream
* Builds fine in mock
* File list looks OK

rpmlint of python-memcached:
E: python-memcached non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/memcache.py 0644
W: python-memcached summary-ended-with-dot A Python memcached client library.
W: python-memcached invalid-license Python

Valid licenses defined in the rpmlint checks are 'Python license' and 'Python Software Foundation 
License'
(/usr/share/rpmlint/TagsCheck.py)

- Why the BuildRequires on python-setuptools? It uses distutils.
- the PKG-INFO file in doc doesn't seem very useful to me.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.