[Bug 243978] Review Request: cjet - Converts PCL data to Canon CaPSL III printer language
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jun 29 20:34:37 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: cjet - Converts PCL data to Canon CaPSL III printer language
Alias: cjet-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243978
mmahut at redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review?, fedora-cvs- |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs?
------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2007-06-29 16:34 EST -------
+ source files match upstream:
d80e83d47b79b03028a00b72ac27e3de /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/cjet089.tgz
+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+ license field matches the actual license.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ latest version is being packaged.
+ compiler flags are appropriate.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installs properly
+ debuginfo package looks complete.
+ rpmlint is silent.
+ final provides and requires are sane:
[root at storm cjet]# rpm -qp --provides
/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/cjet-0.8.9-1.fc8.i386.rpm
cjet = 0.8.9-1.fc8
[root at storm cjet]# rpm -qp --requires
/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/cjet-0.8.9-1.fc8.i386.rpm
libc.so.6
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)
[root at storm cjet]#
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list