[Bug 230935] Review Request: aircrack-ng - 802.11 (wireless) sniffer and WEP/WPA-PSK key cracker

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Mar 4 22:05:53 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: aircrack-ng - 802.11 (wireless) sniffer and WEP/WPA-PSK key cracker
Alias: aircrack-ng

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230935


andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de  2007-03-04 17:05 EST -------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- - rpmlint is silent
- - package is named according to guidelines
- - spec file name is ok
- - software is licensed under the GPL
- - spec file license matches actual license
- - license is included as doc
- - spec is written in AE (as far is I can tell)
- - spec is readable
- - sources matches upstream:
    [awjb at alkaid] md5sum aircrack-ng-0.7.tar.gz ../SOURCES/aircrack-ng-0.7.tar.gz 
    34c0447951d438d76fa32d08eab5da01  aircrack-ng-0.7.tar.gz
    34c0447951d438d76fa32d08eab5da01  ../SOURCES/aircrack-ng-0.7.tar.gz
- - builds fine (fc6: mock/x86_64)
- - no BR are needed
- - no locales are part of the package
- - no shared libraries are part of the package
- - package is not relocatable
- - package does not create any directories
- - package does not contain duplicate files
- - file permissions are correct
- - package contains %clean section
- - use of macros is ok
- - doc size is ok
- - no header/static lib files in package
- - no pkgconfig files in package
- - no lib files in package
- - no devel package
- - no libtool archives in package
- - no gui applications included
- - no files are owned by other packages
- - source package contains license file

package looks good to go. APPROVED.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF60KKQEQyPsWM8csRAj0OAJsHhXQPeSYSYnNqaNqDPJwDRIYQggCaAoY5
4yA+xA+26RPJomQxUy1cZiw=
=qvkj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list