[Bug 220393] Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220393





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-03-05 09:08 EST -------
(In reply to comment #17)
> OK, I'll do that. However, I still have some questions:
> 
> * Is the versioning of libSynopsis.so really necessary ? 
>   I don't plan to provide
>   any kind of backward compatibility in the short term (the API and ABI still
>   evolve a lot)

Does this mean that API/ABI may change even on 0.9.X series?
Anyway I recommend to provide somajor.
 
> * What tools other than rpmlint do you use to validate 
>   a package ? I did use that
>   but couldn't see some of the issues you reported earlier.

Actually the items the reviewer should check is not only
rpmlint issue, mainly written on:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets

And a reviewer may check other points which are not written
on these documents (well this depends on reviewers).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.