[Bug 231732] Review Request: sinjdoc - Documentation generator for Java source code
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Mar 13 04:19:27 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: sinjdoc - Documentation generator for Java source code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231732
------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-03-13 00:19 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> My only comment: should we Obsolete/Provide gjdoc?
No, the two tools can be installed in parallel, and sinjdoc doesn't yet support
all of the command-line options that gjdoc supports. I think for the first few
sinjdoc package releases we should keep gjdoc around, and obsolete gjdoc later.
>
> The only thing that needs fixing is the changelog entry.
OK, I always use the Emacs rpm-mode changelog format. I guess it pads dates
with spaces rather than numbers. Anyway, it looks like I'll commit this package
on a double-digit date, so the padding is irrelevant.
The updated spec and SRPM files are at the same URLs.
I think this one is ready-to-go.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list