[Bug 231732] Review Request: sinjdoc - Documentation generator for Java source code

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Mar 13 04:19:27 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: sinjdoc - Documentation generator for Java source code


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231732





------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com  2007-03-13 00:19 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> My only comment:  should we Obsolete/Provide gjdoc?

No, the two tools can be installed in parallel, and sinjdoc doesn't yet support
all of the command-line options that gjdoc supports.  I think for the first few
sinjdoc package releases we should keep gjdoc around, and obsolete gjdoc later.

> 
> The only thing that needs fixing is the changelog entry.

OK, I always use the Emacs rpm-mode changelog format.  I guess it pads dates
with spaces rather than numbers.  Anyway, it looks like I'll commit this package
on a double-digit date, so the padding is irrelevant.

The updated spec and SRPM files are at the same URLs.

I think this one is ready-to-go.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list