[Bug 232342] Review Request: mcs - A configuration file abstraction library

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Mar 27 12:16:51 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mcs - A configuration file abstraction library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232342


j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl  2007-03-27 08:16 EST -------
MUST:
=====
0 rpmlint output is:
W: mcs incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.4.1-1.fc7 0.4.1-0.1
W: mcs no-documentation
W: mcs-devel no-dependency-on mcs
W: mcs-devel no-documentation
* Package and spec file named appropriately
* Packaged according to packaging guidelines
* License ok
* spec file is legible and in Am. English.
* Source matches upstream
* Compiles and builds on devel x86_64
* BR: ok
* No locales
* ldconfig run for shared libraries
* Not relocatable
* Package owns / or requires all dirs
0 No duplicate files & Permissions
* %clean & macro usage OK
* Contains code only
* %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package
* -devel package as needed
* no .desktop file required

Must FIX
========
* The following rpmlint messages:
W: mcs incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.4.1-1.fc7 0.4.1-0.1
W: mcs no-documentation
  For the docs, add: "%doc AUTHORS COPYING README TODO"
* Remove the unnecessart: "Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig"
* Remove msc_config.h and patch the other .h files to not include it


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list