[Bug 225284] Merge Review: aspell-sr
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Mar 30 11:16:03 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: aspell-sr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225284
panemade at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-03-30 07:16 EST -------
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
- rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and RPM.
But following messages are ignorable
E: aspell-sr no-binary
E: aspell-sr only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
E: aspell-sr configure-without-libdir-spec
+ SPEC file contains explanation about above warnings.
+ source files match upstream.
a068ba095e7246fd3bbc92e7d0287998 aspell6-sr-0.02.tar.bz2
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required.
+ %doc does not affect runtime.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ Dose owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Requires: aspell >= 12:0.60
+ Provides: aspell-sr = 50:0.02-3.fc7
+ Not a GUI APP.
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list