[Bug 239525] Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239525





------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2007-05-09 05:47 EST -------
rpmlint on SRPM reports
W: gammu mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12)
The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a
cosmetic annoyance.  Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both.

rpmlint on RPM reports
W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/startppp
The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one
that probably should not be executable.  Verify if the executable bits are
desired, and remove if not.

W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/fax/faxsend
The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one
that probably should not be executable.  Verify if the executable bits are
desired, and remove if not.

W: gammu spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/fax/faxreceive
The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one
that probably should not be executable.  Verify if the executable bits are
desired, and remove if not.

W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/gprs
The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one
that probably should not be executable.  Verify if the executable bits are
desired, and remove if not.

W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/statsppp
The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one
that probably should not be executable.  Verify if the executable bits are
desired, and remove if not.

W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/data
The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one
that probably should not be executable.  Verify if the executable bits are
desired, and remove if not.

W: gammu doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/fax/faxreceive
/bin/sh
An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in
the package.  Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example
scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation.

W: gammu doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/fax/faxsend
/bin/sh
An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in
the package.  Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example
scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation.

W: gammu doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/data /bin/sh
An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in
the package.  Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example
scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation.

W: gammu doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/gprs /bin/sh
An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in
the package.  Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example
scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation.

W: gammu doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/startppp
/bin/sh
An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in
the package.  Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example
scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation.

W: gammu doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/statsppp
/bin/sh
An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in
the package.  Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example
scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation.



rpmlint on gammu-devel reports
W: gammu-devel no-dependency-on gammu
W: gammu-devel summary-not-capitalized gammu development files
Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter.

W: gammu-devel non-standard-group Development/libraries
The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid.  Valid groups are:
"Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving",
"Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases",
"Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering",
"Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia",
"Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System",
"Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers",
"Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System",
"Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System
Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System
Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "User
Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support".


rpmlint on gammu-libs reports
E: gammu-libs library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libGammu.so.1.0
This package contains a library and provides no %post scriptlet containing
a call to ldconfig.

E: gammu-libs library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libGammu.so.1.0
This package contains a library and provides no %postun scriptlet containing
a call to ldconfig.



any reason to have separate -libs rpms?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.