[Bug 238349] Review Request: xfce4-places-plugin - Places menu for the Xfce panel
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat May 12 23:50:48 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xfce4-places-plugin - Places menu for the Xfce panel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238349
kevin at tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-12 19:50 EST -------
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License(GPL)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
fc9828001674e7428ef4023e4a320c87 xfce4-places-plugin-0.2.0.tar.bz2
fc9828001674e7428ef4023e4a320c87 xfce4-places-plugin-0.2.0.tar.bz2.1
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane.
SHOULD Items:
OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should function as described.
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
Issues:
1. Same minor non blocking comment about the Requires for xfce4-panel being 4.4.0.
If we know we are building against 4.4.1, shouldn't we require that?
Shouldn't matter much however.
I see no blockers, this package is APPROVED.
Don't forget to close this review request once it's been imported and built.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list