[Bug 239963] Review Request: perl-IO-AIO - Asynchronous Input/Output
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue May 15 04:44:28 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-AIO - Asynchronous Input/Output
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239963
tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-15 00:44 EST -------
For some reason the server at rubenkerkhof.com sends spec files with
Content-Type: text/html, which makes it a bit more difficult than usual to
inspect them.
The package itself is fine.
* source files match upstream:
aa513866389ca768822ec2866500ccc2c85a7ce4f49a816be90e40d28f604259
IO-AIO-2.33.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream (COPYING file just says "same as Perl").
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper:
As far as I know, the Test module is still in the base perl package.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
AIO.so()(64bit)
perl(IO::AIO) = 2.33
perl-IO-AIO = 2.33-1.fc7
=
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
perl(base)
perl(strict)
* %check is present and all tests pass:
All tests successful.
Files=8, Tests=63, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.17 cusr + 0.10 csys = 0.27 CPU)
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list