[Bug 322091] Review Request: proxyknife - Customizable multithreaded proxy hunter

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Nov 6 23:03:47 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: proxyknife - Customizable multithreaded proxy hunter


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322091


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2007-11-06 18:03 EST -------
Everything looks good to me.  The only problem I see is that the info file
corrupts the directory with the extra string "This is proxyknife.info, produced
by makeinfo version 4.11 from proxyknife.texi."  But that's not unique to this
package; gnuplot does it as well.  I don't know enough about info to say how
you'd fix it.

* source files match upstream:
   622d7117f14175683551f9004b6f9713d3c0352470c0b2dce926c765c2e63e71
   proxyknife-1.7.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   config(proxyknife) = 1.7-1.fc8
   proxyknife = 1.7-1.fc8
  =
   /bin/sh
   /sbin/install-info
   config(proxyknife) = 1.7-1.fc8
* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.  I installed the package and it 
  seems to run, although I have no proxies to test it against.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* locale files present; %find_lang used properly.
* scriptlets OK: install-info
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.  (The docs are 
  several times larger than the single executable, but the whole package is 
  still under a megabyte.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list