[Bug 370561] Review Request: bmpx - Beep Media Player eXperimental

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Nov 19 13:03:30 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: bmpx - Beep Media Player eXperimental


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=370561





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-11-19 08:03 EST -------
Before checking -3:

(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Well,
> > 
> > ! License is actually strict GPLv2.
> Yes - did I miss anything here?
  No.. it is all right.

> >      I think the proper way is to rebuild bmpx every time firefox
> >      is upgraded, or to separate firefox extension related files
> >      from bmpx (and submit a new review request for bmpx-mozextension,
> >      for example) if you don't want to rebuild whole bmpx.
> The updated spec above creates such an extension, I've nailed the Firefox
> compatible version to 2.0.0.9 however I think on the long run we'd be better off
> to adapt the current Firefox plugin handling in a version independent directory
> for extensions, i.e. we have
> /usr/lib[64]/mozilla/plugins for plugins and should use
> /usr/lib[64]/mozilla/extensions for extensions.
> 
> Do you think I should file a bug report for this issue?
  If firefox comes to handle such directories it is preferable for
  everyone, so you can file against firefox if you want.
  


> > * -devel package?
> >   - Well, why is this -devel package needed?
> >     bmpx does not contain any libraries in ldconfig default paths,
> >     and -devel package does not contain any symlinks for libraries.
> > 
> >     As far as I see this package, -devel package is completely unneeded.
> My opinion differs here. While the -devel subpackge contains no libraries so
> far, all files contained within, i.e. header files and the pkgfile are only
> useful for bmpx plugin developers and totally useless for pure end users.
  Okay, this is a valid reason.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list