[Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Oct 5 22:03:27 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406





------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com  2007-10-05 18:03 EST -------
If you don't mind I'll take it :)

I got a 404 error with the SRPM above, I'll use this instead:
http://devel.foss.org.my/~kagesenshi/repo/private/testing/libcompizconfig/libcompizconfig-0.5.2-0.1.fc7.src.rpm
Let me know if I should be using another SRPM.

+ source files match upstream
+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
- license field matches the actual license.
"GPL" is no longer a vlid license. Please specify the version - See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing for more info.
+ license is open source-compatible, GPL License text included in package.
+ latest version is being packaged.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ compiler flags are appropriate.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installs properly
+ debuginfo package looks complete.
+ rpmlint is silent.
It isn't "silent", but the errors can be ignored.
+ no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
- owns the directories it creates.
It should own %{_datadir}/compizconfig and %{_libdir}/compizconfig
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
+ headers, pkgconfig files are in -devel package
+ no .la files

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list