[Bug 346161] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-ivtv - Xorg X11 ivtv video driver
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Oct 23 05:36:29 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-ivtv - Xorg X11 ivtv video driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346161
tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag| |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-23 01:36 EST -------
This is a basic xorg driver; nothing fancy. rpmlint is silent and everything
looks good. I have the firmware in a local repo so that this will install
properly for me, but I don't have the hardware to test this on.
You might want to flesh out the description just a little bit if possible.
Specifically, it would be nice to know which boards are supported. It looks
like it only works with the PVR350; I'm not sure that the other boards have a
framebuffer or even do any output.
* source files match upstream:
e98a2ed67fea25ab7f94eecb5a53a2d3a3c42de93557d77d774fa18d311c807a
xf86-video-ivtv-1.0.0.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
? description is OK (might be nice to include a little more info)
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
ivtv_drv.so()(64bit)
xorg-x11-drv-ivtv = 1.0.0-1.fc8
=
ivtv-firmware
xorg-x11-server-Xorg >= 1.3.0.0-6
* %check is not present; I've no way to test this package.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list