[Bug 338361] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=338361





------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com  2007-10-25 15:34 EST -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> rpmlint turns up a few problems:
> 
> xorg-x11-drv-openchrome.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin
> /usr/lib64/libchromeXvMC.so.1.0.0
> xorg-x11-drv-openchrome.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun
> /usr/lib64/libchromeXvMC.so.1.0.0
> xorg-x11-drv-openchrome.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin
> /usr/lib64/libchromeXvMCPro.so.1.0.0
> xorg-x11-drv-openchrome.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun
> /usr/lib64/libchromeXvMCPro.so.1.0.0
> 
> Yeah, you should probably do the usual ldconfig run, even though another driver
> with XvMC libraries (i810) doesn't do that.

There's no point.  The XvMC sublibraries are loadables, they're only ever used
with dlopen().

> Then there are a whole bunch of these:
> 
> xorg-x11-drv-openchrome.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
> /usr/lib64/libchromeXvMC.so.1.0.0 _XReply
> xorg-x11-drv-openchrome.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
> /usr/lib64/libchromeXvMCPro.so.1.0.0 _XReply

They're provided by libXvMC, which dlopens libchromeXvMCPro.so.

These aren't problems.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.