[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

[Bug 292331] Review Request: ladspa-amb-plugins - Ambisonics LADSPA plugins



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ladspa-amb-plugins - Ambisonics LADSPA plugins


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292331





------- Additional Comments From j w r degoede hhs nl  2007-09-17 16:10 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Typo in the "amb-plugins" Provides:
> 

This will be fixed in the imported version

> Suggesting you replace 'I use' with 'to use' in the %description

Idem

> 
> With the Provides in the Obsoletes/Provides pair you practically
> occupy the "amb-plugins" namespace. Is this really necessary
> to keep both package names when this is a new-entry in Fedora?
> 

The obsoletes is necessary because it used to be called amb-plugins in somewhat
older but not very old CCRMA releases, the provides is there as upstream's name
is amb-plugins and thus IMHO yum install amb-plugins should work too.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]