[Bug 302451] Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean)

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302451





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-09-24 04:06 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> > * Well, while this package uses relative symlink on
> >   %_sysconfdir/X11/fontpath.d, bug 300651 uses absolute symlink.
> >   Would you unify them? (for these symlinks, all other packages
> >   seem to use absolute symlinks)
> 
> Actually now I made it relative in baekmuk-ttf-fonts now too, but if 
> it is a bad idea I can revert.
  - I don't know which is better (although I prefer relative).

> 
> > * %ghost %verify(not md5 size mtime) files 
> >   "fonts.cache-1" "encodings.dir" are no longer needed?
> 
> Yes, I think they can go.
  Thanks.

> 
> (In reply to comment #3)
> >   Similar with bug 300651, "Conflicts: fonts-korean <= <somever>" is better
> 
> Hmm, maybe it makes sense, though I think this is no actual conflict
> of files.
  - Yes, there is no actual conflict, however baekmuk-bdf and old
    fonts-korean rpms owns same files and marking conflicts is better
    (IMO)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.