[Bug 440211] Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Apr 3 14:46:28 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440211
michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan at gmail.com
Flag| |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-04-03 10:46 EST -------
Package meets naming and packaging guidelines: YES
- Spec file matches base package name.: YES
- Spec has consistent macro usage. YES
- Meets Packaging Guidelines. YES
- License: GPLv2+
- License field in spec matches: YES
- License file included in package: YES
- Spec in American English: YES
- Spec is legible.: YES
- Sources match upstream md5sum:
MD5(OOoLatexEmf_noarch_src.tar.gz)= ad1ab04077828e91a4df906a850bc013
- Package needs ExcludeArch: NO
- BuildRequires correct: YES (builds correctly in koji/mock, see under SHOULD
items)
- Spec handles locales/find_lang: N/A
- Package is relocatable and has a reason to be.: N/A
- Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.: YES
- Package has a correct %clean section. YES
- Package has correct buildroot: YES
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
- Package is code or permissible content: YES
- Doc subpackage needed/used.: NO
- Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.: YES
- Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. YES (F-9, x86_64)
- Package has no duplicate files in %files. YES
- Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. YES
- Package owns all the directories it creates. N/A
- rpmlint output.
rpmlint latex2emf-1* : clean
- final provides and requires are sane (glibc, rpmlib provides removed): yes
SHOULD Items:
- Should build in mock: YES
- Should build on all supported archs: YES (see above)
- Should function as described. YES: tested on F-9. Works on one source file,
breaks on another: "cannot get font size for ..."
- Should have sane scriptlets. YES
- Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. N/A
- Should have dist tag YES
- Should package latest version YES
Issues:
Breaks on the one file I mentioned; documentation does not specify usage (-bb ?
-transp ?). But these are issues for upstream.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list