[Bug 440246] Review Request: firecontrol - A console oriented tool for Linux to access a FireWire bus

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Apr 4 03:03:31 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: firecontrol -  A console oriented tool for Linux to access a FireWire bus


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440246





------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2008-04-03 23:03 EST -------
Builds fine and rpmlint finds nothing to complain about.

According to the source (or commander.c, at least), the license is GPLv2+.  Do
you see anything that might restrict it to GPLv2 only?

Everything else looks good to me.

* source files match upstream:
   415e3e257472c3f784eba43d0c298d2432491b20870f0cbe6beb6756692235f8  
   firecontrol-0.2.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
? license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   firecontrol = 0.2-1.fc9
  =
   libraw1394.so.8()(64bit)

* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.  I have no way to test this 
  software.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list