[Bug 254058] Review Request: e16-themes - Themes for Enlightenment, DR16

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Apr 29 02:15:30 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: e16-themes - Themes for Enlightenment, DR16


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254058


kevin at tummy.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2008-04-28 22:15 EST -------
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (MIT with advertising)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
20fbaff803c3decdf3ac7c363b37c42e  e16-themes-0.16.8.0.2.tar.gz
20fbaff803c3decdf3ac7c363b37c42e  e16-themes-0.16.8.0.2.tar.gz.orig
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
See below - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should function as described.
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version

Issues:

1. As per usual, you might ask upstream to relicense. ;)

2. rpmlint says:

e16-themes.noarch: E: zero-length
/usr/share/e16/themes/BlueSteel/slideouts/slideouts.cfg
e16-themes.noarch: E: zero-length
/usr/share/e16/themes/BlueSteel/buttons/buttons.cfg
e16-themes.noarch: E: zero-length
/usr/share/e16/themes/BrushedMetal-Tigert/buttons/buttons.cfg
e16-themes.noarch: E: zero-length
/usr/share/e16/themes/BrushedMetal-Tigert/slideouts/slideouts.cfg
e16-themes.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/e16/themes/BlueSteel/sound/sound.cfg

I am guessing that these zero-length files are needed?
If not, it would be nice not to ship them... can you confirm?

e16-themes.noarch: W: invalid-license MIT with advertising
e16-themes.src: W: invalid-license MIT with advertising

Ignore.

None of those are really blockers.
If you can check on the zero-length files and ping upstream before
importing that would be great.

This package is APPROVED.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list