[Bug 457808] Review Request: gwibber - An open source microblogging client for GNOME developed with Python and GTK

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Aug 5 08:06:13 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457808


Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |panemade at gmail.com
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |panemade at gmail.com




--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com>  2008-08-05 04:06:10 EDT ---
Review:
+ package builds in mock (rawhide i386).
koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=758674
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream url
debf3a59379f67bafc9a01d65562d784  gwibber-61bzr.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ defattr usage is correct.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Desktop file installed successfully.
+ GUI App.
APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list