[Bug 448397] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448397


Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pertusus at free.fr




--- Comment #18 from Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr>  2008-08-08 10:13:29 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> No it is not okay.
>
> But, if I am right about process, until and unless I say that I am not
> interested in this package further or i don't respond quickly as and when
> needed, you are not supposed to duplicate the package and say "this is my
> package and review it"
> 
> I am and will be happy to own and maintain this package. In case you want to
> co-maintain you are welcome -- there is a procedure for everything.

You are right. 

However, if somebody comes and informally review Peter srpm and approve 
it it is still an interesting data point, though, in te end it is your 
package that will have to be formally reviewed and approved.

It would even be acceptable if you said, instead of 'not ok' something
along, 'reviewer, you can review Peter package as if I had prposed it 
myself'. But you seem to prefer that you resubmit somethin for the 
review and it is your choice, and since you are th esubmitter it 
has to be accepted by the reviewer (but as I said just above anybody can 
still comment on Peter package). 



@Peter: a review should never ever be done in a hurry. If the package 
does'nt make F10 launch, it will be in the updates. In my opinion
this is especially true for this review since it was first entered
2 years ago...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.