[Bug 444245] Review Request: whatsup - Node up/down detection utility
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Aug 15 03:17:47 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444245
--- Comment #3 from Roy Rankin <rrankin at ihug.com.au> 2008-08-14 23:17:46 EDT ---
OK rpmlint is silent.
OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
OK specfile named properly
OK license is open source-compatible (GPLv2+).
OK license field matches the actual license.
OK license file included in %doc
OK Specfile in english and readable
OK source files match upstream and latest version(md5sum matches)
OK package builds in mock (rawhide/i386).
N/A specfile handles locales properly
OK Package owns directories it creates
OK Requires packages owning non-core directories it uses
OK No duplicte files in %files
OK %defattr(...) in every %files section
OK valid %clean section
OK consistent use of macros
OK package includes code
N/A Large documentation in -doc subpackage
OK %doc files not required for running
OK .h files in -devel subpackage
N/A static libraries must be in -static subpackage
N/A Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) must require pkgconfig
OK If package contains lib files with suffix .so files in -devel
OK -devel subpackage requires base package with versions
OK no .la libtool not included in packages
N/A GUI applications handle %{name}.desktop file properly
OK %install runs rm -rf %{buildroot}
OK filenames in packages use valid UTF-8
OK dist tag is present.
rpmlint output:
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list