[Bug 459218] Review Request: python-morph - Image Morphology Toolbox
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Aug 16 14:33:54 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459218
Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu
--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2008-08-16 10:33:53 EDT ---
This package is clean, but I believe it is improperly named. I can't get to
the wiki to look at the guidelines right now, so I'll just skip the bits about
naming in the review. I'm thinking that either "pymorph" or "python-pymorph"
would be proper names under the guidelines, but since you don't "import morph",
I don't believe it should be named just "python-morph".
It looks like 0.90 was released at about the same time you submitted this
ticket. I don't see anything in the new version that would affect this review,
but if you'd like for me to look over an updated package then I will.
I tried to test this by running "python morphdemo.py" with the package
installed, but I only get:
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pymorph/compat.py:489: Warning: 'with' will
become a reserved keyword in Python 2.6
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "../../morphdemo.py", line 39, in <module>
from pymorph.compat import *
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pymorph/compat.py", line 507
def mmcwatershed(f,Bc=None,linereg='LINES'):
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
I'm not sufficiently familiar with python to understand what's happening.
* source files match upstream:
2bcd2d061fc539af983bfec221a99cff2a9c9389a1615a6fab471b40864cd935
pymorph-0.89.tar.gz
* specfile is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package (in README file).
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
python-morph = 0.89-1.fc10
=
numpy
python(abi) = 2.5
? Manual tests seem to fail.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list