[Bug 454469] Review Request: php-pear-Var-Dump - rovides methods for dumping structured information about a variable

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Aug 20 23:09:47 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454469


Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |tibbs at math.uh.edu




--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu>  2008-08-20 19:09:46 EDT ---
* source files match upstream:
   d73b985d46a118a65d11dc1e93d6e0e7f0919237f090920478d2ab3250d17826  
   Var_Dump-1.0.3.tgz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* rpmlint is silent.
X missing php-pear(PEAR) dependency:
   php-pear(Var_Dump) = 1.0.3
   php-pear-Var-Dump = 1.0.3-1.fc10
  =
   /bin/sh
   /usr/bin/pear

* %check is not present; pear module tests can't be run at build time.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* scriptlets are OK (pear module registration).
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list