[Bug 458139] Review Request: ruby-pam - Ruby bindings for pam

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Aug 21 19:37:24 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458139





--- Comment #3 from Darryl L. Pierce <dpierce at redhat.com>  2008-08-21 15:37:23 EDT ---
* General

 XX - Package name

 The secondary package delivering the binary library should be delivered in a
package named "ruby-pam-lib".

 XX - License info is accurate
 XX - License tag is correct and licenses are approved

The website says LGPL without version.
The spec says LGPLv2+.
The COPYING file in the GEM lists the original authors name with no mention of
LGPL.

 OK - License files are installed as %doc
 OK - Specfile name
 OK - Specfile is legible
 OK - No prebuilt binaries included
 OK - BuildRoot value (one of the recommended values)
 OK - PreReq not used
 OK - Source md5sum matches upstream
 OK - No hardcoded pathnames
 OK - Package owns all the files it installs
 OK - 'Requires' create needed unowned directories
 OK - Package builds successfully on i386 and x86_64 (mock)
 OK - BuildRequires sufficient
 OK - File permissions set properly
 OK - Macro usage is consistent
 OK - rpmlint is silent

* Package a rubygem

 OK - Package is named rubygem-%{gemname}
 XX - Source points to full URL of gem

 Source0 is just the filename, not the full URL for downloading the source.

 OK - Package version identical with gem version
 XX - Package Requires and BuildRequires rubygems

 No "Requires: rubygems" in the spec.

 OK - Package provides rubygem(%{gemname}) = %version
 OK - Package requires gem dependencies correctly
 OK - %prep and %build are empty
 OK - %gemdir defined properly, and gem installed into it
 OK - Package owns its directories under %gemdir

** noarch rubygem

 OK - No arch-specific content in %{gemdir}
 OK - Package is noarch

** arch rubygem

 OK - No arch specific content in %{gemdir}
 OK - Defines ruby_sitearch from rbconfig
 OK - arch specific content moved to %{ruby_sitearch}

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list